← Back to DocumentsDocument
POWER response to The Application for Water Rights by Arapaho County
Summary
A letter written by Klingsmith to the public regarding the victory POWER won to prevent water from Taylor and Union Park to the front range. ?He is also urging caution to the decision by saying there is possibility for this to appealed in the Supreme Court of Colorado.
Local Knowledge Graph (38 entities)
Loading graph...
Knowledge graph centered on POWER response to The Application for Water Rights with 38 nodes and 77 connections. Top connected: not mentioned, Spruce, Atriplex canescens, United States Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado Water Conservation Board.
Stakeholders (11)
Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.
United States Bureau of ReclamationColorado Water Conservation BoardUpper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictColorado River Water Conservation DistrictColorado Supreme CourtPOWER (People Opposing Water Export Raids)Rocky Mountain Biological LaboratoryNorthern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Show 3 more
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictCity and County of DenverCentral Colorado Water Conservation District
Places (28)
Concepts & Topics (6)
Species (3)
External References Cited (2)
Works cited by this document, grouped by type.
legislation (1)
- Colorado River Compact (1922)
permit (1)
- The Application for Water Rights by Arapaho County
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Document
Proposed Union Park Reservoir Part 6
Document
Proposed Union Park Reservoir Part 3
Document
Proposed Union Park Reservoir Part 4
Article
Technical Appendix: Legal Analysis - Shepherding Appropriated Water in Colorado for Colorado River Compact Security
Book
Law of water for irrigation in Colorado, The
Article
<i>Response</i> : Our Upper Colorado River Project
Dataset
Testing API Python
Dataset
Testing API Python
Dataset