“How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic shut down undergraduate research programs across the United States. A group of 23 colleges, universities, and research institutes hosted remote under- graduate research programs in the life sciences during Summer 2020. Given the unprec- edented offering of remote programs, we carried out a study to describe and evaluate them. Using structured templates, we documented how programs were designed and im- plemented, including who participated. Through focus groups and surveys, we identified programmatic strengths and shortcomings as well as recommendations for improvements from students’ perspectives. Strengths included the quality of mentorship, opportuni- ties for learning and professional development, and a feeling of connection with a larg- er community. Weaknesses included limited cohort building, challenges with insufficient structure, and issues with technology. Although all programs had one or more activities related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice, these topics were largely absent from
Local Knowledge Graph (33 entities)
Knowledge graph centered on “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive with 34 nodes and 231 connections. Top connected: not mentioned, Atriplex canescens, Crested Butte, R. J. Smith, J. Reithel.
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
Differential response of three large mammal species to human recreation in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA
Assessing science training programs: Structured undergraduate research programs make a difference
Colorado River Report
Texas Regulates the Edwards Aquifer
The Forgotten Economics of Water Trades
The State of Open Data 2020
Webinar: Building Resilience to Climate Change in the Gunnison Basin
PEaCE Lab description
Cited By (35 times, 1 in Knowledge Fabric)
References (32)
32 references to works outside the Knowledge Fabric