Towards a U.S. national program for monitoring native bees
Abstract
Abstract North America has more than 4000 bee species, yet we have little information on the health, distribution, and population trends of most of these species. In the United States, what information is available is distributed across multiple institutions, and efforts to track bee populations are largely uncoordinated on a national scale. An overarching framework for monitoring U.S. native bees could provide a system that is responsive to national needs, resources, and capacities. Five major action areas and priorities for structuring a coordinated effort include: (1) Defining the scope, aims, and cost of a national native bee monitoring program; (2) Improving the national capacity in bee taxonomy and systematics; (3) Gathering and cataloging data that are standardized, accessible, and sustainable; (4) Identifying survey methods and prioritizing taxa to monitor; and (5) Prioritizing geographic areas to be monitored. Here, we detail the needs, challenges, and opportunities associated with developing a multi-layered U.S. national plan for native bee monitoring.
Local Knowledge Graph (30 entities)
Knowledge graph centered on Towards a U.S. national program for monitoring nat with 31 nodes and 110 connections. Top connected: Bombus, Ligusticum porteri, Bombus terrestris, Bombus appositus, Bombus impatiens.
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Bee phenology is predicted by climatic variation and functional traits
The effect of repeated, lethal sampling on wild bee abundance and diversity
Life-history traits predict responses of wild bees to climate variation
Data from: The effect of repeated, lethal sampling on wild bee abundance and diversity
Bumble bee occurrences of North America from 1805–2020
Long-term bee phenology and abundance data at the RMBL, Gothic, Colorado
Species Endangerment Patterns in the United States
Conserving Biodiversity on Native Rangelands: Symposium Proceedings
A System for Conservation Planning: Progress in Summit and Larimer Counties
Cited 110 times
References (49)
1 in Knowledge Fabric, 48 external